A native app is a smartphone application that is customized to a single operating system, such as Android or iOS, and developed in one of the platforms’ official programming languages, like Java or Kotlin for Android and Objective-C as well as Swift for iOS. Let’s have a look at the pros and limitations of the Native apps.
Pros:
The Native mobile app is created within a fully formed environment, following the operating system’s technical and user experience specifications. The appearance and feel of the app’s interfaces and interactions will be consistent. As a result, navigation and use are faster and more pleasant.
The program is stored on the device, which allows the software to take advantage of the device’s processing power.
Limitations:
It takes longer to produce a consistently high-quality app for all platforms since developers must write particular codes for each platform, such as Android, IOS, and so on. It’s the same as writing code for two separate apps.
As distinct software must be created for the Google Play Store and the App Store, therefore; developers have a limited amount of time to design apps for each platform. As well as, new updates or bug patches must be uploaded to the app store, and users must then install them.
React Native is a Facebook-created mobile app development framework based on React.js, which is written in Javascript and allows for the construction of multi-platform Android, iOS, and Windows apps in a single code base. React Native began as a hackathon project at Facebook. Below is the list of pros and limitations of the react-native apps.
Pros:
Developers can utilize the React-Native framework for free and reuse the code on other platforms, so they won’t have to engage separate developers and designers for each platform. As a result, the cost of developing a mobile app is reduced in terms of operations, maintenance, and design.
React Native connects to Native components for both operating systems and generates code for Native APIs in advance and without restriction. React Native codes make data binding easier, resulting in a more stable and trustworthy program.
In comparison to Flutter, React Native has poor architecture. React Native is constructed on the Flux architecture, which uses a bridge to interface with native modules. This link is known as the JavaScript bridge. JavaScript code is only compiled to native code during runtime. When compared to Flutter’s Skia C++ engine, which does not require a bridge because it contains all native modules, this reduces React Native’s performance.
Debugging with React Native is difficult for an amateur developer, but it isn’t much more complicated than debugging in other cross-platform apps. React Native has a built-in inspector, although it’s constrained by the simulator window’s modest screen size. In a nutshell, debugging in React Native is a complex and time-consuming process..
Flutter is a Google-developed cross-platform framework. It was first released in May 2017 and has been rapidly growing in popularity among developers. It is a portable user interface framework. To put it another way, it’s a full-featured app Software Development Kit (SDK) that includes widgets and tools. It’s worth noting that apps created using Flutter are more intuitive and simple to use. The problem is that app developers can change the UX using this framework. This procedure requires the modification of a state variable. This is an important point to consider when comparing Flutter vs Native vs React Native.
Despite the fact that Flutter appears to be the future of app development due to its ongoing development and extensive capabilities, it has a few pros and limitations that are yet to be updated.
Pros:
Flutter is also like React Native, which means a cross-platform application that allows you to have a single codebase for several projects. Flutter can potentially be created for the Fuchsia platform, a Google-designed operating system that is rumoured to be a replacement for Android. Flutter may be used to create web and desktop apps in addition to mobile apps.
Flutter is simple to use and integrate, increasing durability and flexibility. Developers are always astonished by the progress made in custom widgets and features with each release.
Limitations:
Flutter is not as old as its peers, and it lacks third-party libraries. Although it provides an excellent UI package, it still requires third-party libraries for advanced development.
For example, libraries for React Native are much easier to come by than for Flutter. In addition, several Flutter widgets are platform-specific. If what they need isn’t accessible for their target platform, this may cause some developers to abandon Flutter.
Developers can use code push to publish changes to their apps without having to go through the normal app store release process. Bugs can be fixed without releasing a new release, allowing for a more web-like continuous development cycle. React Native, Cordova, and Ionic are among the platforms that support it. This is not possible with Flutter.